Asking for Letters of Recommendation

Asking for Letters of RecommendationAsking for Letters of RecommendationChecking references is usually the final step prior to being hired (or accepted into a graduate school program). Its important to be selective on who you use as a reference and who youll ask for a letter of recommendation. You will want to include people who view you favorably and who have positive things to say about you. If in doubt, ask your reference if they feel that they know you well enough to provide a good reference. Types of References Basically, there are two types of references professional and personal. Professional references can address your skills, knowledge, and work ethic while personal references can better discuss your personal traits. Employers and graduate school programs will usually let you know the number of references they want and may specify the type of reference they are seeking as well. A good reference will provide knowledge of your character, integrity, specialized skills, and work habits. Hopefully, your references are from people who are excited about your career plans and can provide an employer or grad program with important details that create a favorable impression about you. Steps for Asking for a Letter of Recommendation Determine the purpose of the letter of recommendation and then identify the appropriate person(s) who can best supply that reference.Its better to ask your reference if they feel they know you well enough to provide a good reference than getting a reference that does not boast of your accomplishments and personal work ethic.Provide the reference with supporting documents such as resume, classes taken (and grades received), as well as any internships, volunteer work, or jobs that you have completed. Make sure your reference knows the purpose of the recommendation so they can address the skills and accomplishments based on the type of position or graduate school program to which you are applying. Apprise references of your goals and update them on your hintergrund and the type of job/program you are seeking. Keep them abreast of what you are applying for and let them know once you have accepted a position. Be sure to get permission prior to using someone as a reference. Advise your references of any deadlines and provide as much time as possible for references to write a recommendation. A hurried reference letter will not have the same impact as a well-planned letter boasting of your strengths and accomplishments. Follow up and check with your references to see if they need any additional information. You can gently remind them of the deadline if the date is approaching soon. As a courtesy, you can also supply your reference with a stamped envelope to send the letter directly to the employer. Employers usually prefer confidential references where the reference is able to supply valuable information without worrying about the applicants response to the reference. Who to Ask for a Reference ProfessorsPre vious Supervisors at jobs or internshipsAcademic AdvisorsCoachesSpecial Contacts (music teachers, sports contacts, volunteer/job/internship associates) These individuals can all be used as character references as well as attest to your work ethic and desire to achieve. A list of references is usually supplied upon request by an employer or graduate school program. The list should be developed on a separate sheet of paper and provided when asked. You may ask your reference for a copy of the letter that you can use in future applications. Be sure to send a thank you note to your reference thanking him/her for their time.

U.S. Military Chemical Warfare Protection

U.S. Military Chemical Warfare ProtectionU.S. Military Chemical Warfare ProtectionThere is a considerable variety of lethal and incapacitating chemical werbers and the means to deliver them. The technology needed to produce these chemicals is similar to that used to make plastics, fertilizers, and detergents. As this knowledge spreads throughout underdeveloped countries, the increased possibility of chemical warfare becomes a harsh reality. Chemical warfare agents are poisonous chemicals that can produce irritating effects, make materials or areas unusable, and cause death. The severity of the injuries depends on the type of agent, concentration of the agent used, and the method of dissemination. Types of Chemical Agents The United States Military classifies lethal chemical warfare agents into four categories Nerve AgentsNerve agents attack the nervous system and affect muscle control, vision, heart, and lung functions. The Department of Defense (DOD) considers this the fruchtwe in likely category of chemical agents that may be used against U.S. Military personnel engaging in combat operations. Blister AgentsBlister agents attack and destroy cell tissue causing irritation, inflammation, and severe blisters. This tissue damage increases the chance of infection and may ultimately cause death. In most cases, pain and blisters may not occur until long after exposure. Choking AgentsChoking agents cause irritation and inflammation of the bronchial tubes and lungs. If a sufficient amount enters the lungs, the flssig may gather there. Death results from a lack of oxygen. Blood AgentsBlood agents disrupt the oxygen-carrying properties of the blood. behauptung fast-acting agents dissipate quickly in the open air but are very deadly. Blood agents also damage mask filters, so filters must be changed as soon as possible after a blood agent attack. Delivery and Physical Properties Chemical agents can be released by artillery shells, rockets, bombs, grenades, mines, aircraft sprays, and missiles. Additionally, they can be sprayed from air, land, and water vehicles or covertly used to contaminate food and water supplies. Common forms of chemical agents include Gases and Vapors. Gases and vapors are usually invisible. However, gas clouds may be visible for a short time after their release or in areas where there is little air movement to dissipate them. Their primary route of entry is through the respiratory tract, although some agents in heavy concentrations can penetrate the eyes and exposed skin. Gases and vapors may linger for up to several hours, with heaviest concentrations occurring in low-lying, dead air spaces such as buildings, caves, shell craters, ravines, and wooded areas. Liquids. Liquid agents can be clear to dark in color and have the viscosity of fine machine oil thickened agents may have the appearance of motor oil. Chemical agents used in liquid form can be extremely difficult to detect with the unaided eye. The most reliable m ethod of both detecting and identifying liquid nerve and blister agents is M8 chemical detector paper. Finally, liquid agents also release toxic vapors that can be inhaled and can remain effective for many days. Solids (Powders). Some agents are released in powder form. They can enter the body through the skin or be inhaled. Agents in dust-like form are released in a variety of climatic conditions and can remain effective for many weeks. These dusty agents are difficult to detect unless wetted. Once detected, they may be decontaminated with a 5 percent chlorine bleach solution. Protective Equipment for Chemical Warfare Regardless of the type, concentration, or method of attack, the best immediate protection against chemical agents is the mask and chemical-defense ensemble. The United States Military has the best equipment fielded anywhere in the world, and when used correctly, it protects against enemy chemical or biological attack. The mask is the primary piece of protective eq uipment. When properly worn, it protects the face, eyes, and respiratory tract against all known chemical and biological agents. In addition to the mask, the chemical-defense ensemble used by the U.S.Military includes the chemical overgarment (pants and jacket), the mask-hood, protective gloves, and protective overboots. Military Gas Mask Gas masks are not new to the military. Military gas masks were first employed en masse during the First World War to protect soldiers from gas attacks. Toxic gases were seen as a way to bring an end to the stalemate on the cowboyfilm Front. The predominant chemical agents used on the Western Front were mustard gas (blister agent) and chlorine gas (choking agent). From then until now gas masks have become as much a part of the military members personal equipment as the rifle, flak vest, and helmet. Generally, gas masks are constructed from a thick non-permeable rubberised plastic, some having an in-built protective hood covering the head. The ru bberised plastic is designed to form an airtight seal against the skin. For this reason, facial hair heightens the risk of a bad seal and should be avoided (this is the primary reason that the Navy changed itsregulations and outlawed beards). Gas masks use replaceable charcoal filters that filter liquid, aerosol and vaportoxins from the contaminated air. Gas mask filters have a limited lifespan. They must be replaced if they are damaged, exposed to water/moisture, after a platzset period of exposure in a contaminated environment, after prolonged usage in a non-contaminated environment, or if their shelf life has expired. The Protective Overgarment The charcoal impregnated overgarment issemi-permeable and must be worn over normal combat clothing. The lining works in exactly the saatkorn way as a gas masks respirator filter, removing toxins and contaminants. The semi-permeable fabric allows some perspiration to escape. The overgarment offers protection against toxins and chemical agents in liquid droplets, vapor and aerosol form. Because the fabric is semi-permeable, it cannot protect the wearer against liquids, and wet or saturated suits (either by precipitation, chemical agent or from the military members own perspiration) are compromised and must be replaced. Like the masks, the overgarments are designed to have a limited lifespan and must be replaced after a set exposure or wearing time. Overboots and Gloves The accompanying NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical)protective overboots and gloves are constructed from thick impermeable rubberized plastic and are worn over normal combat boots and cotton liner gloves. Glove thickness can be varied for operation requirements where dexterity is at a premium. Unfortunately, while the U.S. Military chemical-defense ensemble provides a high degree of protection, it can also reduce work and combat effectiveness by hampering vision, hearing, and dexterity. It can cause mental stress and heat exhaustion during heavy workloads in warm temperatures. Thats where the Military flaumer Levels come into play. Introduction to Military flaumer Levels flaumer stands for Mission-Oriented Protective Postures. MOPP levels allow commanders to escalate their protective postures based on the threat of imminent attack and accomplish operations by balancing mission continuation and protection of the force. Because MOPP levels are standardized and easily understood, commanders can change protective postures without long explanations. Commanders can raise or lower protection through six levels, MOPP level 0 through MOPP level Alpha. Individual protection increases from MOPP level 0, where only conventional protective equipment (web gear, helmet, and available flak vests) is worn and chemical-defense equipment is kept nearby, to MOPP level 4, where all protective equipment is worn. MOPP level Alpha requires individuals to only wear their mask and gloves and is used as a protective posture only in certain instance s after the type of contamination has been determined. The Impact of Increasing MOPP Levels As MOPP levels and the protective gear required increase, an individuals efficiency decreases as a result. Although less susceptible to being a chemical casualty, heat problems are more common. Noncommissioned Officers (NCOs) and Officers in the U.S. Military have been trained to ensure proper work and rest cycles for their troops are observed to control body heat buildup during chemical or biological warfare conditions. Dehydration is also a severe problem when people work in high temperatures while wearing the chemical-defense ensemble. People tend to drink to satisfy perceived thirst rather than to meet their actual physiological needs. Realizing this, the U.S. Military trains their personnel does not wait to become thirsty before drinking. Military members are trained to drink regularly while in a MOPP to optimize their performance and to avoid becoming a heat casualty, and NCOs and O fficers monitor and direct their people to drink the prescribed amount of water if they do not voluntarily drink enough. The masks actually have a tube which can be used to drink from an attachment on the canteen lid, allowing military members to continue to drink water even in a contaminated environment. Overview of the MOPP Levels MOPP Level 0.In MOPP Level 0, the mask is worn in a carrier on the military members hip. Chemical-protective gear is issued, prepared, and located so the member can retrieve it within 5 minutes. MOPP Level 0 is used during periods of increased alert when the enemy has chemical/biological employment capability, but there is no indication of use in the immediate future. MOPP Level 1.In this level, the chemical overgarment (pants and jacket) are worn, and the rest of the equipment is carried. MOPP Level 1 is used when it is determined that chemical/biological attack on the theater of operations is possible. MOPP Level 2.In MOPP Level 2, the overgarment is worn, and the overboots are worn. The mask, hood, and gloves are carried in the mask-carrier, strapped to the hip. MOPP Level 2 is initiated when chemical/biological attack is probable. MOPP Level 3.In this MOPP level, the overgarment, mask/hood, and overboots are worn, but the protective gloves may be carried. MOPP Level 3 is used after chemicals have been used by the enemy, but in areas with negligible hazard. MOPP Level 4.Everything is worn. This condition is used during/after an attack when chemical weapons have been used or are suspected. MOPP Level Alpha.The mask, hood, and gloves are worn, but the protective overgarment is not. MOPP Level Alpha is called only during certain circumstances, such as when upwind from a negligible vapor hazard agent, or when inside buildings or aircraft. Contamination Avoidance Exposure to chemical or biological(CB) warfare agents may occur during and after an attack therefore, U.S. Military personnel are trained to use extreme caution to limit the spread of contamination. Whenever possible, critical resources such as aircraft, vehicles, and equipment are protected from contamination by placing them under cover in hangars, sheds, or other structures, or covering them with plastic sheets or waterproof tarpaulins before an attack occurs. When sheltered in a building or tent, personnel are instructed to keep windows, doors, canopies, etc., closed when notified of a pending attack and after the attack until notified that the hazards no longer exist. In addition to using protective clothing and equipment, common sense plays a large role when working in contaminated areas. Military personnel are trained to avoid kneeling, sitting, or walking in contaminated areas if possible, and not to touch anything unless it is absolutely necessary. When the mission permits, teams will be sent out to detect and mark contaminated areas. The U.S. Military has specialized chemical decontamination teams which can decontaminate equipment and land-areas, once the hazard has been identified and located. Personnel Decontamination If a chemical agent gets on the skin or protective equipment, it must be removed immediately. Some agents are quick-acting and can incapacitate within a matter of minutes. The degree of injury caused by a chemical agent increases the longer it remains on the skin. The military issues special personnel decontamination kits called M291 and M295 individual decontamination kits. They are the most effective method of removing chemical agents from the skin. In the absence of a personal decontamination kit, military personnel can use a 5 percent chlorine bleach solution to remove the chemical agent from equipment and a 0.5 percent solution to remove agents from the skin. The eyes are very vulnerable when exposed to nerve and blister agents. If one of these agents gets in the eyes, military personnel are trained to irrigate them with water. U.S. Military personnel are also issued nerve agent antidote s and taught to use them, if necessary. Decontamination Powder.Decontamination powder is intended by the military for decontaminating soldiers skin and personal equipment from liquid NBC agents. The powder is usually finely ground to give it a larger surface area, making it an extremely effective adsorbent. Generally, the main ingredients are chloride of lime and magnesium oxide which provide both absorption and neutralization properties. Chemical Detection Paper.Chemical detection paper can detect and identify airborne chemical warfare agents. The paper is attached as patches to the chemical-defense overgarment using either an adhesive backing or Velcro-like bonding material. The paper is impregnated with dyes sensitive to different types of chemical warfare agent and will indicate which type of agent is present in its corresponding pigment signal. Nerve Agent Antidote.Medical representatives issue nerve agent antidotes and pretreatment during increased readiness. The primary nerve agent antidote is an intra-muscular injector with a cocktail of oxime and atropine. Additionally, medical representatives will issue pyridostigmine bromide tablets if the appropriate type of nerve agent is expected to be employed. Military members take these tablets, in advance of an attack, when directed by higher headquarters. These tablets, when combined with the antidote, limits the effect of certain types of nerve agent poisoning. Biological Attacks In additional to chemical attacks, the U.S. Military is also prepared for attacks using biological agents, which are living micro-organisms that cause disease in people, animals, or plants, or cause materials to deteriorate. These agents can be used directly to cause diseases such as anthrax, cholera, plague, or diphtheria, or indirectly to infect crops and reduce food supplies. These diseases spread in a variety of ways including ingesting the infected plants or animals, bites from infected animals and insects or inhaling the micro-organisms. Micro-organisms used in biological warfare include bacteria, rickettsiae, fungi, and viruses (commonly referred to as germs). They enter the body, reproduce, and overcome the bodys defenses. Biological agents and chemical agents are generally disseminated in the same way. The mask can provide protection against some airborne biological agents. One of the best defenses against biological agents is the bodys resistance to illness. Staying in top physical condition and observing a high standard of personal cleanliness helps military members help reduce the spread of disease. Military members are routinely vaccinated during (and after) basic training for a variety of diseases. Additionally, military members who deploy to areas that are considered high threat for biological agents, receive the anthrax vaccine and the smallpox vaccine.

What resistance to change reveals about your leadership

What resistance to change reveals about your leadershipWhat resistance to change reveals about your leadershipResistance has a bad reputation.We see resistance as something negative - we blame people for getting in the way. As a former CEO, Ive been there many times. We are so focused on driving change, that we have little patience for those who resist (us).However, resistance is a necessary force of change. As Stanfords Bob Sutton said If you are bedrngnis facing resistance, it is because you are not pushing too hard.Stop fighting resistance and start paying attention. Lets use it to reflect on what we can improve as change leaders.The True Meaning of ResistanceIt is easier to resist at the beginning than at the end. ? Leonardo da VinciMany times people resist change because they dont want to try something new. Maybe they are too comfortable or afraid of uncertainty. Sometimes, they fear failure or believe they dont have what it takes.However, many times people are just tired, conf used, or not feeling safe. They are not fighting change - they just expect clear rules.If you want people to act differently, you have to behave differently too.Here are the six most frequent signals I observe when coaching teams improve their change-fitness. Youd better pay attention to them.1. People resist being exhaustedSelf-control represents the mental power we all need to focus, innovate, resist our impulses or to keep going in spite of failure or frustration. Self-control builds the resilience necessary to drive change.Research shows that self-control is an exhaustible resource. As cited on the book Switch, when people restrain their emotions, they burn the ability to control their feelings and behaviors.Change wears people out - what looks like laziness is always exhaustion.Any business transformation requires extra effort from your team members. Are you taking other tasks off their plates?2. People resist the lack of benefitsYou cant ignore self-interest. People are driv en by both functional and emotional benefits. If you cant connect the need for change with an apparent personal gain, they will stop paying attention.People are pragmatic - what looks like resistance is actually lack of interest.People wont bother doing something that wont provide them any clear benefit. Are you addressing the whats in it for me?3. People resist lack of contextYour team doesnt just want to do a job - people want to be part of a mission larger than themselves. Change initiatives should be tied to a meaningful purpose.People want to understand the big picture - what looks like indifference is often a lack of context.Dont assume. Provide context. Does your team understand the why behind a new initiative?4. People resist stupiditySometimes, certain initiatives dont make sense. Pressure from the board or the pressure to be perceived as innovative drive organizations to make foolish decisions.People dont like stupidity - what looks like resistance is usually sheer com mon sense.Be open to getting pushback from your team. Sometimes, we all miss what doesnt make sense. Do you allow your team to challenge you the same way you challenge them?5. People resist lack of prioritizationMost people dont know where their leaders are coming from. CEOs see things differently - they usually assume their teams shared their views. From a distance, things seem simpler said than done. What seems like a simple strategic direction might look complex and demanding for those who are in the trenches.People cant do everything at once - what looks like avoidance is basically lack of capacity.New initiatives always add more tasks and deadlines. Does your team have the autonomy to adjust priorities accordingly?6. People resist unsafe culturesThe culture of an organization is what is rewarded and punished. You cant have it both. Some companies encourage people to take risks but dont provide Psychological Safety - people are afraid of being attacked or fired if they make m istakes.People need a safe space to experiment - what looks like a people aufgabe is always a culture problem.Trying new ways of working requires taking risks too. Are you providing a safe culture for people to experiment and make mistakes?Whatever you resist, persistsWhere there is power, there is resistance. ? Michel FoucaultAn organizational transformation is never a smooth ride. It creates internal resistance in both leaders and their teams. Reflect on your own behavior.Navigating uncharted waters test the whole crew, not just the sailors.Resistance is a signal. Are you paying attention?Upgrade your teams mindsetDownload my ebook Stretch Your Team how to thrive in a changing world get your free copy.Receive my weekly Insights for Changemakers Sign Up NowThis article first appeared on Medium.